Human Signal Index
Trust & Transparency

Built to be checked, not just believed.

The Human Signal Index maps narratives in the information environment. Because that work only matters if people can trust it, here is exactly how we operate — with live evidence — and how to hold us to it.

Trust at a glance

Published signals
0
Published reports
0
Human reviewed
Not enough data yet
Traceability
0.0%
Corrections issued
0
Sources active
63

Platform health

0
Signals reviewed today
0
Reports published today
0.0%
Avg traceability
21,132
Review backlog
1,000
Source activity

Transparency scorecard

Evidence LinkedNot enough data yet
Human ReviewedNot enough data yet
TraceableNot enough data yet
Version ControlledNot enough data yet
Corrections LoggedNot enough data yet
Source Verified38.2%

Review pipeline

21,132Signal
0Evidence
0Analysis
3Human Review
0Publication

Every published finding clears each stage — nothing publishes without human review.

How evidence becomes intelligence

Select a stage to see how traceability and human review work at each step.

1

A public signal is captured

A narrative or campaign is observed in public sources and recorded with its capture time. Nothing is acted on yet — it simply enters the pipeline as raw input.

Corrections center

No corrections issued — the published record is clean. Any future correction will be logged here with its reason.

Source accountability

165
Sources
67%
Reliability avg
38.2%
Validation rate
  • Other165 sources

Source identities are never exposed — accountability is reported at the category level.

Decision explainability

Risk scoring framework

Every signal is scored on a clear, ordered risk scale (Low → Critical) tied to its narrative category — explainable, never a black box.

Review framework

Findings move through evidence collection and analysis, then a human reviewer approves or rejects before anything publishes.

Confidence framework

Each published finding carries a confidence and traceability score so readers can weigh how strongly it is supported.

Human oversight framework

No publication, correction, or enforcement is automated. A person decides, and the decision is recorded and reversible.

Audit timeline

  • SOURCE VERIFIED
    New source verified
  • SOURCE VERIFIED
    New source verified
  • REVIEW COMPLETED
    Signal review completed
  • REVIEW COMPLETED
    Signal review completed

How we work

People make the decisions

No finding is published, no account is restricted, and no enforcement happens automatically. A person reviews and decides every time.

Everything can be traced

Each claim links back to the source it came from. You can follow a published finding all the way to the original evidence.

Decisions are recorded

Reviews, approvals, and changes are written to an audit log with who acted, when, and why, and they can be reversed.

Evidence comes first

We archive the underlying material and seal it with a hash so anyone can check it has not been altered.

Our commitments

Publication standards

A report stays a draft until a human reviewer approves it. We publish corrections, and the reason for them, when we get something wrong.

Security commitments

Access is limited by role, sessions are protected, and we run a vulnerability disclosure program so researchers can report problems safely.

Your rights

You can ask what data we hold about you and request a correction. We do not sell your data.

Transparency

We document how the platform works, which model versions produced a result, and where we have made mistakes.

Report a problem

Found a security flaw, or need to report misconduct? We have dedicated, confidential channels.